| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> El mar, 12-02-2013 a las 19:43 +0000, Fabio Erculiani escribió: |
| 3 |
>> I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for |
| 4 |
>> having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through |
| 5 |
>> genkernel. Pretty much the same I do in Sabayon since 2007. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think shouldn't have any problems on providing them also as an |
| 9 |
> alternative, the problem is who would maintain that builds (as I guess |
| 10 |
> Sabayon is using different sources than gentoo and, then, probably not |
| 11 |
> all chosen options for Sabayon will work on Gentoo :/) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If the goal is providing a general purpose kernel that's based on |
| 14 |
genpatches (plus BFQ and aufs3) and could be used in official live |
| 15 |
images, the current sabayon kernels could work just fine for Gentoo. |
| 16 |
They are coming directly from Linus' (or gregkh for stable releases) |
| 17 |
git repo. Upstreaming sabayon-kernel.eclass and kernel binary ebuilds |
| 18 |
is something I'd be interested in, as long as other devs here are |
| 19 |
willing to help me out as well. |
| 20 |
But I don't want to go off-topic too much. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Fabio Erculiani |
Archives