Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: Allen Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach)
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 05:41:47
Message-Id: 1095572460.26130.2187.camel@simple
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Considering dropping the hardened toolchain (A Quantitive Approach) by Allen Parker
1 On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 01:16, Allen Parker wrote:
2 > Hey Ned, solar, hardened folks...
3 >
4 > I've got a couple of pennies to throw into this mix:
5 > Even though my own participation (due to work schedules - 3 jobs
6 > doesn't leave a whole lot of time for other stuff) has waned, I
7 > believe that your hardened toolchain is top-notch. Yes, it's bleeding
8 > edge, it's not mature, etc... that doesn't mean we should have a
9 > partial-birth abortion. Hardened has been around for a while, yes, but
10 > if you spend 10 minutes in #gentoo you'll see, a LOT of our users
11 > aren't prepared for something as in-depth as hardened.
12 >
13 > Gentoo currently LEADS linux distributions in configurability in
14 > regards to hardened/selinux/security. Bar NONE! For the experienced,
15 > hardened *can't* be replaced by anything out there. If I had the skill
16 > level to assist in any way, I'd be the first guy in line to help.
17 > Unfortunately, my experience is more limited to finding
18 > non-programming solutions to get the job, whatever that job may be,
19 > done. Perhaps this thread will catch someone's eye, someone that CAN
20 > help, at least drum up some user support.
21 >
22 > Solar, before reading your email, I had no idea that you were feeling
23 > like that. Maybe we can get someone with a *little* more experience
24 > than me, perhaps a trusted user/non-dev that can be a bug-filter?
25 >
26 > To the hardened community: If you can afford the time, check
27 > bugs.gentoo.org for hardened bugs... if there are bugs that you know
28 > of that are FUD, email a list of bug #'s to your favorite hardened
29 > dev, after replying with a solution to the particular user, whether or
30 > not it's a PEBKAC issue or not.
31 >
32 > that's all for me, gotta head back to work *sigh*
33
34
35 Don't panic yet..
36 So far I have been getting good feedback from some users and atleast one
37 potential developer in some mails off list. I plan to put a detailed
38 mail together in as few days and mail the interested parties and
39 hopefully assemble a larger more professional team so we can fully
40 continue to offer these types of technologies and continue to push fwd
41 together.
42
43
44
45 >
46 > Allen Parker
47 > infowolfe@××××××××××××.net (when i'm online) #/tmp #gentoo-hardened #gentoo-dev.
48 >
49 > --
50 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
51 --
52 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
53 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature