1 |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:18:55 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
| On Tuesday 27 July 2004 2:07 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
| > Except that the voting will not be indicative of what our user base |
5 |
| > actually wants. Instead, it will indicate the whim of a vocal |
6 |
| > minority of Off The Wall posters and zealots from that IRC channel |
7 |
| > I'm not allowed to talk about. Most of our users don't condone |
8 |
| > join-flooding other distributions' channels on IRC. Most of our |
9 |
| > users give at least a vague hoot about having a stable kernel and |
10 |
| > filesystem. Most of our users would rather that their ebuilds |
11 |
| > compiled, even if it meant missing out on the occasional x.x.x.1 |
12 |
| > release from upstream. However, most of those users won't be voting. |
13 |
| |
14 |
| Those are assumptions, nothing more. |
15 |
|
16 |
Those are assumptions based upon a very large amount of evidence |
17 |
obtained from the forums, the -user mailing list and IRC. Like it or |
18 |
not, we *do* have a small number of users who *do* going around |
19 |
trolling, spamming and generally making a nuisance of themselves. You |
20 |
really think that the aa-G aa-E thing is indicative of our user base? |
21 |
|
22 |
| > We already have a good indication of how many people care about a |
23 |
| > bug -- the length of the Cc: list usually works pretty well. |
24 |
| |
25 |
| Really? So you think that if we started measuring the CC lists that |
26 |
| it wouldn't somehow be tainted by the "vocal minority" that would |
27 |
| otherwise be voting? Your logic is totally flawed. |
28 |
|
29 |
No, I'm saying it's an indicator which already exists if someone wants |
30 |
to find out how popular their bug might be, nothing more. However, Cc: |
31 |
list spamming is pretty pointless, whereas vote spamming could be |
32 |
construed to mean something. |
33 |
|
34 |
| I frankly don't understand why you're so outspoken on this issue. You |
35 |
| can ignore votes if that's what you choose to do. This is not a |
36 |
| policy change proposal, this is an enhancement request for Bugzilla. |
37 |
|
38 |
1) Because it will lead to "this bug has over a hundred votes, why is |
39 |
it being ignored?" posts. |
40 |
|
41 |
2) Because it is yet another field in bugzilla. We already have far too |
42 |
many clicky boxes for most people. |
43 |
|
44 |
3) Because it will lead to vote spamming. Search the Off The Wall forum |
45 |
for "portage ignorance" for a good example of why this won't work. |
46 |
|
47 |
| Also please read: http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/16.19.shtml |
48 |
|
49 |
Posting irrelevant links does not make an argument. |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
53 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
54 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |