1 |
mån 2001-10-01 klockan 10.54 skrev Dan Armak: |
2 |
> On Monday 01 October 2001 17:56, you wrote: |
3 |
> > Yes, and what I meant is that Dan Armak should the only one using them, |
4 |
> > period. That means you can't use them. |
5 |
> I understand and agree that verwilst (or anyone else) shouldn't be using |
6 |
> eclasses or his day-today work and all his ebuilds. I do think he should help |
7 |
> me test them, because two testers are always much better than one. I |
8 |
> introduced Verwilst to eclasses wih this purpose, perhaps I was wrong to do |
9 |
> so on his first day as a Gentoo developer. Since you hink I should do this |
10 |
> strictly alone, I will. |
11 |
|
12 |
Hi! |
13 |
|
14 |
First of all (and this is nothing against Verwilst) I would appriciate |
15 |
if I was informed before a new developer joins the Desktop Team. |
16 |
|
17 |
About the ebuilds, I think that it would be a good idea if _only_ Dan |
18 |
checked them in. It would be ok to ask help from others to send you |
19 |
ebuild and test the ones that you check in. By this procedure you can |
20 |
control the ebuild/eclasses before commiting them. |
21 |
|
22 |
Also if only you commit them people reading commit-logs will only see |
23 |
you commit to this "project". If lots of people commits eclasses/ebuilds |
24 |
that uses eclasses some people might be confused that it's ok. |
25 |
|
26 |
Regards, |
27 |
Mikael Hallendal |
28 |
-- |
29 |
Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se |
30 |
CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ |
31 |
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |