1 |
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 04:56:29PM +0000, James McMechan wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> Silly Notes: |
4 |
> While I personally considered IA64 useless shortly after arrival, |
5 |
> Intel has just (5/11/17) announced another bump in that family the |
6 |
> 9700 Series. |
7 |
|
8 |
And it will also be the last Itanium released http://www.pcworld.com/article/3196080/data-center/intels-itanium-once-destined-to-replace-x86-in-pcs-hits-end-of-line.html |
9 |
|
10 |
The contract/agreement, between HPE and Intel, covers development of |
11 |
Itanium through to the end of 2017. Intel is not selling enough of them |
12 |
to warrant further development. Intel has been urging Itanium users to |
13 |
migrate to high-end Xeons. Some features, formerly available from Intel |
14 |
only on Itanium, have started showing up on high-end Xeons. |
15 |
|
16 |
An interesting, somewhat cynical, post on Slashdot... |
17 |
https://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10604939&cid=54412501 |
18 |
suggests that Intel came up with a radically different design for |
19 |
Itanium, versus x86, specifically to avoid a cross-licencing agreement |
20 |
that allows AMD to clone Intel x86 and x86_64 cpus. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
24 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |