Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:26:49
Message-Id: 474236FB.8080905@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild by Wolfram Schlich
1 Wolfram Schlich kirjoitti:
2 > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> [2007-11-09 10:13]:
3 >> On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
4 >>> 1.1 sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
5 >>>
6 >>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
7 >>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
8 >>> if useq debug; then
9 >> use() is useq() now. Dunno whether this is common enough to deserve a
10 >> repoman check.
11 >
12 > I won't change that until useq() is going to be finally removed and
13 > that action is *required* then (all of my ebuilds have useq() for
14 > control structures, and I'm not going to change *all at once now*
15 > just because someone has decided to equal use() and useq()... if
16 > someone feels like spending time on that, feel free to care about
17 > it ;)).
18 >
19
20 I added http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199722 for nuking useq in
21 EAPI 2.
22
23 Regards,
24 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies