From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild | ||
Date: | Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:26:49 | ||
Message-Id: | 474236FB.8080905@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild by Wolfram Schlich |
1 | Wolfram Schlich kirjoitti: |
2 | > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> [2007-11-09 10:13]: |
3 | >> On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote: |
4 | >>> 1.1 sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild |
5 | >>> |
6 | >>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup |
7 | >>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
8 | >>> if useq debug; then |
9 | >> use() is useq() now. Dunno whether this is common enough to deserve a |
10 | >> repoman check. |
11 | > |
12 | > I won't change that until useq() is going to be finally removed and |
13 | > that action is *required* then (all of my ebuilds have useq() for |
14 | > control structures, and I'm not going to change *all at once now* |
15 | > just because someone has decided to equal use() and useq()... if |
16 | > someone feels like spending time on that, feel free to care about |
17 | > it ;)). |
18 | > |
19 | |
20 | I added http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199722 for nuking useq in |
21 | EAPI 2. |
22 | |
23 | Regards, |
24 | Petteri |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild | Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@g.o> |