Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:06:07
Message-Id: 20071121010256.GA1644@bla.fasel.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-process/fcron: ChangeLog fcron-3.0.4.ebuild by "Petteri Räty"
1 * Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> [2007-11-20 02:26]:
2 > Wolfram Schlich kirjoitti:
3 > > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> [2007-11-09 10:13]:
4 > >> On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
5 > >>> 1.1 sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
6 > >>>
7 > >>> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
8 > >>> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
9 > >>> if useq debug; then
10 > >> use() is useq() now. Dunno whether this is common enough to deserve a
11 > >> repoman check.
12 > >
13 > > I won't change that until useq() is going to be finally removed and
14 > > that action is *required* then (all of my ebuilds have useq() for
15 > > control structures, and I'm not going to change *all at once now*
16 > > just because someone has decided to equal use() and useq()... if
17 > > someone feels like spending time on that, feel free to care about
18 > > it ;)).
19 > >
20 >
21 > I added http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199722 for nuking useq in
22 > EAPI 2.
23
24 Thanks, I'm Cc:'ed now :)
25 --
26 Regards,
27 Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@g.o>
28 Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list