| 1 |
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 22:37, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> How exactly are you adding the applications to |
| 3 |
> /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask? I found that adding |
| 4 |
> >=net-www/apache-2.0.0 worked perfectly to keep apache at 1.x |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
That is exactly what I have in /etc/portage/profiles/package.mask, and |
| 7 |
yet emerge still wants to bring in 2.0.47 . If I make that change to the |
| 8 |
package.mask in /usr/portage/profiles, it behaves. [Until the next |
| 9 |
emerge rsync, of course] |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It's almost as if portage is ignoring that directory. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Is there a change to some central config file (make.conf? make.globals?) |
| 14 |
That I may somehow have missed? Some new environment / make variable? |
| 15 |
The rest of my tree seems up to date (I did an emerge world not too long |
| 16 |
ago) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
AfC |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives