Archives
Archives
| From: | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | ||
| Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:43:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20061031173853.247a820b@blashyrk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Jakub Moc |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0100 |
| 2 | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and |
| 5 | > vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on |
| 6 | > junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds |
| 7 | > C, D and E which... ) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | To avoid breaking the dep tree for users. Quite simple really. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |