| 1 |
Stephen Bennett napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and |
| 6 |
>> vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on |
| 7 |
>> junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds |
| 8 |
>> C, D and E which... ) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> To avoid breaking the dep tree for users. Quite simple really. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ah. That's apparently much more important than not breaking users by |
| 13 |
providing them w/ non-vulnerable, decently uptodate stuff that's not |
| 14 |
ridden by tons of bugs. Yup. :P |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Jakub Moc |
| 21 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 22 |
GPG signature: |
| 23 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 24 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives