| 1 |
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:15:32 +0200 |
| 2 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a): |
| 5 |
> > Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 7 |
> > >> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar |
| 8 |
> > >> Arahesis wrote: |
| 9 |
> > >>>> How can you easily revert it in a profile? |
| 10 |
> > >>> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults. |
| 11 |
> > >> |
| 12 |
> > >> How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compiler/linker |
| 15 |
> > > specifics and move there non sharable stuff and keep base leaner? |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > lu |
| 18 |
> > > |
| 19 |
> > I'm just going to commit this to default/linux in about 20 minutes |
| 20 |
> > -Wl,-O1 |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Cardoe informed me that he planned to add --hash-style=gnu and |
| 23 |
> --sort-common to default LDFLAGS in the future. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Does anybody know any packages / architectures (except mips) which |
| 26 |
> have any problems with these flags? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
We have versions of glibc pre-2.5 that don't have support |
| 29 |
for .gnu.hash. Can we set a minimum version in the profiles? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
No one should be using them, but you never know. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 35 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 36 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives