Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:19:11
Message-Id: 200807092116.09249.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" by Doug Goldstein
1 2008-07-09 15:45:15 Doug Goldstein napisał(a):
2 > Luca Barbato wrote:
3 > > Fabian Groffen wrote:
4 > >> On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
5 > >>>> How can you easily revert it in a profile?
6 > >>> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults.
7 > >>
8 > >> How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice.
9 > >
10 > > Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compiler/linker specifics
11 > > and move there non sharable stuff and keep base leaner?
12 > >
13 > > lu
14 > >
15 > I'm just going to commit this to default/linux in about 20 minutes -Wl,-O1
16
17 Cardoe informed me that he planned to add --hash-style=gnu and --sort-common
18 to default LDFLAGS in the future.
19
20 Does anybody know any packages / architectures (except mips) which have any
21 problems with these flags?
22
23 --
24 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies