Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:18:38
Message-Id: 20150915131820.41faae1c@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. by konsolebox
1 On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:54:59 +0800
2 konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > Would that mean 5.1 is the same as 5.10? That's clearly illegal to
4 > what most versioning schemes packages follow including the semantic
5 > versioning (http://semver.org/).
6
7 Semantic versioning is a new fad. Certain upstreams still think that
8 5.10 is a lower version that 5.2. Perl used to be notorious for doing
9 this, but they've partially changed in some places but not others.
10
11 The rules are a mess because they need to a reasonable job of dealing
12 with all the crazy.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Request to add ~> atom prefix operator on Portage. konsolebox <konsolebox@×××××.com>