| 1 |
On Tuesday May 11 2004 5:08, foser wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Well actually in one of the bugs I gave a possible alternate approach on |
| 4 |
> how to get rid of these deps, maybe you could try to be more |
| 5 |
> constructive and solve this problem in a way that is satisfying to all |
| 6 |
> parties involved. |
| 7 |
> We have good reasons to add these deps, you have none and are obviously |
| 8 |
> offended by the fact that you have a gnome package now. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> - foser |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> PS. related bugs |
| 13 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50085 |
| 14 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50498 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't think it's about gnome or not gnome myself. I have a concern that this |
| 17 |
is three extra deps for something I'll probably never see. From the hot |
| 18 |
tempers on both sides over this, it almost sounds like you're happy to give |
| 19 |
out a gnome dep for spite, although I'm sure that's not the case, though |
| 20 |
casual observance makes me wonder. I think had this been non-gnome/kde issue |
| 21 |
it would have never had the deps applied, and properly been marked upstream, |
| 22 |
as its a fault in gtk+ packaging for not providing the support for its file |
| 23 |
chooser. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Chuck Brewer |
| 26 |
Registered Linux User #284015 |
| 27 |
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
------------------------------------------------- |
| 31 |
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives