Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:34:08
Message-Id: 439F30A0.40104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
5 | | Proposed change:
6 | |
7 | | ``Posted:``
8 | | Date of posting, in ``yyyy-mm-dd`` format (e.g. 2001-08-14) for
9 | | compatibility with ISO-8601. UTC time in ``T19:53:46+0000``
10 | | format may also be included (`date --iso-8601=seconds`). Mandatory.
11 |
12 | I'll accept that change if you get Grant to accept a mini-GLEP
13 | switching the GLEPs over to use that format too.
14
15 I don't think that we need a GLEP for it, no matter how 'mini' it
16 would be.. Just asked Grant if I can convert dates in current GLEPs,
17 and he's ok with, though he wanted to have input from -dev first, so:
18
19 Anyone objecting to change those dates from "dd-mon-yyyy" format to
20 "yyyy-mm-dd"?
21
22 If not, i'll commit my diff in 24h...
23
24 Danny
25 - --
26 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
27 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
30
31 iD8DBQFDnzCgaVNL8NrtU6IRAgcOAJ0b/to61rIrLyyMLfNpx4rRrvDRDwCeLufm
32 vqe7CvpCLGklzdgsb3DUq54=
33 =offW
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies