| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0530 |
| 3 |
> "Arun Raghavan" <arunisgod@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> And why do you have to be plain insulting about it? Nobody can |
| 6 |
>> magically spot every single bug in any piece of code presented to |
| 7 |
>> them. In fact it's why the "given enough eyes ..." adage is one of the |
| 8 |
>> bases of open source development. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Which is why any responsible person ensures good test coverage. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Just to pour some oil on the flames - |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does |
| 16 |
ignore package.keywords at times, yes? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Test case is: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that would |
| 23 |
have been fixed a long time ago. |
| 24 |
So please stop trolling when you fail so badly at it. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>> I _honestly_ do not understand why there is so much trouble in simple |
| 27 |
>> cooperation amongst adults. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I agree entirely. Why the pkgcore people refuse to do basic automated |
| 31 |
> tests is completely beyond me. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
Mirror, mirror on the wall. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives