Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:07:44
Message-Id: 7DB0FAE7-6F92-43D5-BB33-0048403A0281@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Patrick Lauer
1 On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:01, Patrick Lauer wrote:
2
3 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0530
5 >> "Arun Raghavan" <arunisgod@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >>
7 >>> And why do you have to be plain insulting about it? Nobody can
8 >>> magically spot every single bug in any piece of code presented to
9 >>> them. In fact it's why the "given enough eyes ..." adage is one of
10 >>> the
11 >>> bases of open source development.
12 >>>
13 >>
14 >> Which is why any responsible person ensures good test coverage.
15 >>
16 > Just to pour some oil on the flames -
17
18 Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the pkgcore
19 guys with your whinnings.
20
21
22 > Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does
23 > ignore package.keywords at times, yes?
24 >
25 > Test case is:
26 >
27 > FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail
28 >
29 > in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that
30 > would have been fixed a long time ago.
31
32 Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly
33 experimental.
34
35 You are amusing...
36
37 - ferdy
38
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>