1 |
On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:01, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0530 |
5 |
>> "Arun Raghavan" <arunisgod@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> And why do you have to be plain insulting about it? Nobody can |
8 |
>>> magically spot every single bug in any piece of code presented to |
9 |
>>> them. In fact it's why the "given enough eyes ..." adage is one of |
10 |
>>> the |
11 |
>>> bases of open source development. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Which is why any responsible person ensures good test coverage. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> Just to pour some oil on the flames - |
17 |
|
18 |
Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the pkgcore |
19 |
guys with your whinnings. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
> Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does |
23 |
> ignore package.keywords at times, yes? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Test case is: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail |
28 |
> |
29 |
> in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that |
30 |
> would have been fixed a long time ago. |
31 |
|
32 |
Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly |
33 |
experimental. |
34 |
|
35 |
You are amusing... |
36 |
|
37 |
- ferdy |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |