| 1 |
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> |
| 3 |
>> Just to pour some oil on the flames - |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the pkgcore |
| 6 |
> guys with your whinnings. |
| 7 |
Dude. Shut up. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm not a pkgcore guy. If anything I'm a portage supporter. That I |
| 10 |
accidentally host pkgcore.org doesn't mean I'm "one of them". |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> Y'all are aware that paludis can't parse a valid make.conf and does |
| 14 |
>> ignore package.keywords at times, yes? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Test case is: |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> FEATURES="strict" # test and stricter fail |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> in make.conf ... if you had the tests you claim others lack that |
| 21 |
>> would have been fixed a long time ago. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly |
| 24 |
> experimental. |
| 25 |
Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant. And why |
| 26 |
don't y'all fix a bug like that? First you insult others for not doing |
| 27 |
tests, then you show a lack of tests and are proud of it. Augh. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> You are amusing... |
| 30 |
Hey, I gave you a testcase - now fix it, chop chop! |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives