| 1 |
On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:16, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the |
| 3 |
>> pkgcore guys with your whinnings. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I'm not a pkgcore guy. If anything I'm a portage supporter. That I |
| 7 |
> accidentally host pkgcore.org doesn't mean I'm "one of them". |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Were you able to read English you'd have noted that I implicitly |
| 10 |
excluded you from the "pkgcore guys" in that sentence. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>> Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly |
| 13 |
>> experimental. |
| 14 |
> Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant. And why |
| 15 |
> don't y'all fix a bug like that? First you insult others for not |
| 16 |
> doing tests, then you show a lack of tests and are proud of it. Augh. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Use of Portage configuration files will lead to sub-optimal |
| 19 |
performance and loss of functionality. Full support for Portage |
| 20 |
configuration formats is not guaranteed; issues should be reported via |
| 21 |
trac. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
That's the pretty nice warning. Full support is not guaranteed. We do |
| 24 |
take sane patches, however. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Stop flaming, please. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- ferdy |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives