Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | ||
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:22:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080613102240.4ba5d144@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Patrick Lauer |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:16:31 +0200 |
| 2 | Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 | > > Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly |
| 4 | > > experimental. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | You didn't notice the large warning telling you not to use Portage |
| 9 | config files? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > And why don't y'all fix a bug like that? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | We do what PMS requires regarding handling of inline comments (which is |
| 14 | the same as what some EAPI 0 accepting Portage versions do, so PMS |
| 15 | can't allow inline comments), and indicate an error (rather than |
| 16 | writing junk, as older Portage did) when inline comments are used. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> |