1 |
On 20:54 Thu 28 Oct , Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/28/2010 07:22 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > Your committing this way actually supports the thought that you have |
4 |
> > something to hide, because you don't document what you did, and you |
5 |
> > didn't update the ChangeLog reducing overal visibility of your actions. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> ChangeLog is for users. The package content didn't change at all. There |
8 |
> was nothing to log in for. |
9 |
|
10 |
I like to see a ChangeLog message for everything. If an ebuild suddenly |
11 |
breaks and a user sees no ChangeLog message, the assumption would then |
12 |
be that he somehow broke his system. The QA team is not superhuman in |
13 |
its ability to avoid mistakes... |
14 |
|
15 |
> > I don't want to actually get that suspicious feeling, that makes that I |
16 |
> > actually start looking into what you committed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> When I see someone skipping ChangeLog, I take it as "something so minor, |
19 |
> not worth looking into at all". Quite the opposite. |
20 |
|
21 |
I take it as "making my job as a maintainer more difficult" because it |
22 |
gives me more places I have to look to track down what happened and why. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Thanks, |
26 |
Donnie |
27 |
|
28 |
Donnie Berkholz |
29 |
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux |
30 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |