| 1 |
Am Sonntag, den 04.01.2009, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Roovers: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you |
| 6 |
> > assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other |
| 7 |
> > maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go |
| 8 |
> > through the maintainers first and herds second? Should be pretty |
| 9 |
> > easy to fix... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as |
| 14 |
> assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to |
| 15 |
> have that discussion. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'd say that the correct way to fix this is to fix the metadata schema |
| 18 |
to be able to write something like this: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
<maintainer> |
| 21 |
<team>foo</team> |
| 22 |
</maintainer> |
| 23 |
<maintainer> |
| 24 |
<dev>adev</dev> |
| 25 |
</maintainer> |
| 26 |
<maintainer> |
| 27 |
<team>bar</team> |
| 28 |
</maintainer> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
or |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
<maintainer type="team">foo</maintainer> |
| 33 |
<maintainer type="dev">adev</maintainer> |
| 34 |
<maintainer type="team">bar</maintainer> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Because having to write this: |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
<herd>foo</herd> |
| 39 |
<maintainer><email>adev@g.o</email></maintainer> |
| 40 |
<herd>bar</herd> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
is just nonsense. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Cheers, |
| 45 |
Tiziano |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
------------------------------------------------------- |
| 49 |
Tiziano Müller |
| 50 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 51 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 52 |
Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin |
| 53 |
E-Mail : dev-zero@g.o |
| 54 |
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 |
Archives