Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sami Samhuri <sami@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:14:00
Message-Id: 20050313211544.GK12196@no-eff-eks.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development by Mark Loeser
1 * On Sun Mar-13-2005 at 02:58:45 PM -0500, Mark Loeser said:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
6 > | On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:49:40 +0100 Adrian Lambeck
7 > | <adrian.lambeck@×××××××××.de> wrote:
8 > | | Please have a look at it and tell me what you think:
9 > | | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0035.html
10 > |
11 > | Any automatic machine-done changes to ebuilds will break the tree far
12 > | more than the occasional developer screwup.
13 > |
14 >
15 > It doesn't sound like he's describing something to automatically fix the
16 > ebuilds, or I missed that in the document.
17
18 Under Specification, 3rd last paragraph mentions changing keywords of
19 broken ebuild to "-*".
20
21 --
22 Sami Samhuri

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP concerning ebuild-development Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>