Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Gentoo "Stable" Portage/Releases
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:05:07
Message-Id: pan.2006.01.11.20.49.30.237823@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo "Stable" Portage/Releases by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni posted <1136993910.28257.5.camel@×××××××××××××××××.net>,
2 excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:38:30 -0500:
3
4 > Again, please don't consider my tree proposal as anything "enterprise", at
5 > all. While it can be used as a *basis* for enterprise work, it does not
6 > need to be relegated to any specific usage. It is simply a release tree,
7 > with frozen package versions.
8
9 Good point. "Ultra-stable" tree, then, or as I'm more likely to consider
10 it, "hoary old archaic" tree. =8^) To each his own, I guess...
11
12 --
13 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
14 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
15 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
16 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
17
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list