1 |
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 18:24 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> How about if we posted a question on survey.gentoo.org 3-6 months after the |
3 |
> service has been up that simply asks, "Do you find planet.gentoo.org to be |
4 |
> valuable?" If the "yes" rate is something less than X% (I'd suggest 33%) |
5 |
> then we kill it. If not, we leave it up and consider it a success. This |
6 |
> seems like a very fair, impartial way of gauging the impact that this |
7 |
> service has had on our community. |
8 |
|
9 |
Good idea :) Polling of our user community is very beneficial in a |
10 |
number of ways. |
11 |
|
12 |
I strongly abject to picking an arbitrary cut off though (33%). I would |
13 |
rather that we use some sort of statistical analysis (simple central |
14 |
tendency measures will work). The process is much more scientific, and |
15 |
it ensures that our sampling population is represented fairly. |
16 |
|
17 |
If you need a hand with the statistical analysis, let me know. Stats is |
18 |
a big part of the work that I do on a daily basis ;) |
19 |
|
20 |
Cheers, |
21 |
//John |
22 |
-- |