Archives
Archives
| From: | Andrew Udvare <audvare@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: go-live.eclass for handling go live ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Thu, 04 Jun 2015 19:27:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 980E4381-25D2-499A-92AB-D4007261B715@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] new eclass: go-live.eclass for handling go live ebuilds by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | > On 2015-06-04, at 12:10, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > All, |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > we are starting to get more go packages in the tree, so we need an |
| 6 | > eclass that properly deals with go live ebuilds. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Why live only? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Your eclass does what every other live and non-live ebuild does for Go: create a temporary Go environment without the package in question. This is fine (I hate how Go is designed in this respect). I just think non-live Go packages definitely need an eclass. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Andrew |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: go-live.eclass for handling go live ebuilds | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |