Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:30:33
Message-Id: 200310200030.41694.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move by Luke-Jr
1 On Monday 20 October 2003 7:13, Luke-Jr wrote:
2 > On Sunday 19 October 2003 11:48 pm, C. Brewer wrote:
3 > > Since this isn't completely accurate..maybe a slight tweaking on the
4 > > wording. If you are running a 2.6 kernel with 2.6 headers installed,
5 > > Open-GL apps will fail with X.If you are running a 2.6 kernel with the
6 > > 2.4 headers installed, you won't even notice any change, not to mention
7 > > avoiding quite a few bs problems with packages that wont build against
8 > > the 2.6 headers anyway. (I've run xfree 4.3.0-r3 since it hit unstable,
9 > > and have yet to rebuild it through 2.5 to todays 2.6.0test8)
10 >
11 > Is this an issue at all then? Gentoo doesn't have a 2.6 linux-headers...
12 > --
13 > Luke-Jr
14 > Developer, Gentoo Linux
15 > http://www.gentoo.org/
16
17 It does, but it's not like a simple emerge thing, there's provisions in the
18 dev-sources ebuilds for the headers, and really, when you're running a 2.6,
19 it's usually assumed you can creat the headers yourself...it's not that
20 hard:)
21
22 P.S Please dont cc me on replies to the list or vice versa, I haven't set up
23 to filter the duplicates.
24 --
25 Chuck Brewer
26 Registered Linux User #284015
27 Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.