Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:13:11
Message-Id: 200310200713.07353.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move by "C. Brewer"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Sunday 19 October 2003 11:48 pm, C. Brewer wrote:
5 > Since this isn't completely accurate..maybe a slight tweaking on the
6 > wording. If you are running a 2.6 kernel with 2.6 headers installed,
7 > Open-GL apps will fail with X.If you are running a 2.6 kernel with the 2.4
8 > headers installed, you won't even notice any change, not to mention
9 > avoiding quite a few bs problems with packages that wont build against the
10 > 2.6 headers anyway. (I've run xfree 4.3.0-r3 since it hit unstable, and
11 > have yet to rebuild it through 2.5 to todays 2.6.0test8)
12 Is this an issue at all then? Gentoo doesn't have a 2.6 linux-headers...
13 - --
14 Luke-Jr
15 Developer, Gentoo Linux
16 http://www.gentoo.org/
17 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
19
20 iD8DBQE/k4sAZl/BHdU+lYMRAksgAKCS15nIbis5t8IvPVoa41yh+zWYzwCgiG3Y
21 48OpgDAZKUUbnTAR5+epjH4=
22 =+zAL
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@×××××××××××××.net>