| 1 |
Hey SPARC folks, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
That deletion was due to the fact that there are known security holes |
| 4 |
in all versions of ssh prior to 3.4, I discussed with several older wiser |
| 5 |
devs before removing, if you need it back, use cvs to restore it, but |
| 6 |
keeping things with known security holes in the portage tree doesn't seem |
| 7 |
like good policy to me :-( Sorry for the inconvenience. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
--Brandon |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Fri, 07/05/02 at 12:32:15 +0200, murphy@g.o wrote: |
| 12 |
> Hi, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It seems you have removed one of the older openssh ebuild which was being |
| 15 |
> used in sparc gentoo. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Can I ask you to please put it back and not delete older versions so |
| 18 |
> readily? Other ports depend on other versions of SSH, depending on which |
| 19 |
> one actually works :). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> thanks a lot! |
| 22 |
> maarten |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Donny Davies wrote: |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> > >FYI this is the bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3765 |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > >I'm just asking to make sure you don't remove the older ebuild :). |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > Okay, I won't remove the older openssl ebuild ;-) Not that I was |
| 31 |
> > planning to but I appreciate the heads up. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > Cheers |
| 34 |
> > Donny |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 40 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives