| 1 |
11.08.2015 16:36, Rich Freeman пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 11.08.2015 16:11, James Le Cuirot пишет: |
| 4 |
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:58:49 +0300 |
| 5 |
>>> Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> If both of flags are not set - we stick to default. |
| 8 |
>>>> Should this be set in EVERY ebuild explicitly? |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> Maybe provide some sugar like $(qt_use_default qtgui 5), where |
| 11 |
>>>> qt_use_default is the name of function, qtgui is the package and 5 is |
| 12 |
>>>> the slot for default choice, where either BOTH of flags(qt4, qt5) are |
| 13 |
>>>> enabled or disabled |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> That sounds a little bit like what I suggested earlier. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/884257a2d924a51851d629b1dc9b30df |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> But without introducing brand new useless USE flag. Which makes huge |
| 21 |
>> difference to me :-) |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> If we want the typical user to not set either qt4 or qt5, are we |
| 25 |
> saying that any package that could use either always enable one of |
| 26 |
> them by default? Then all users get a GUI by default, and then users |
| 27 |
> have to explicitly disable it? That seems to be the opposite of how |
| 28 |
> we normally do things, but it does let you get away from having lots |
| 29 |
> of users turning on qt. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I suggested this for packages, where GUI can not be disabled AND it |
| 32 |
should be either qt4 or qt5. Then, if we do not add + to USE |
| 33 |
description, users without anything in make.conf just run the blocker |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 38 |
Gentoo developer |
| 39 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 40 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 41 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives