Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lisa Seelye <lisa@g.o>
To: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:27:49
Message-Id: 1071016130.14948.1434.camel@lisa.thedoh.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] the man-pages package by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 16:36, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > Hi All,
3 >
4 > I'll refer you first to: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32096
5 >
6 > Then I'll ask two questions:
7 >
8 > 1. Should man-pages really belong in the base system (emerge system)?
9 >
10 > 2. Which package's manpages should be preferred, assuming (as is correct
11 > to assume at least until portage-ng comes out) that portage has no
12 > conflicting-files-resolution feature?
13
14 I think it would be beneficial to have man-pages included by default,
15 but not in a way that make them a required component of the system. (ie,
16 so users can emerge unemerge man-pages with no problems.)
17
18 System commands (man-pages) should be preferred over the C function
19 calls.
20
21 --
22 Regards,
23 -Lisa
24 <Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature