Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Futasz <acid.punk@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Prelinking in Gentoo and interactions with portage | ||
| Date: | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 00:21:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20021118011958.2a35c67c.acid.punk@gmx.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Prelinking in Gentoo and interactions with portage by Daniel Robbins |
||
| 1 | On 17 Nov 2002 16:39:45 -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 | > Thanks very much for this info and for looking into this. Recently, |
| 3 | > Mandrake claimed they are superior in performance to Gentoo Linux (in |
| 4 | > one of their newsletters, I think) because they prelink and we don't. |
| 5 | > Maybe we should. Maybe we shouldn't. Opinions welcome :) I'd also like |
| 6 | > to track down that Mandrake comparison -- woodchip, do you have the |
| 7 | > reference? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | http://mandrakeforum.com/article.php?sid=2472&lang=en |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Prelinking in Gentoo and interactions with portage | david mattatall <davidsmind@×××××××××××.com> |