Archives
Archives
| From: | "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | CJ Kucera <pez@××××××××××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: No XFree86 w/ new license | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:00:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | m3smh82p2e.fsf_-_@lugabout.jhcloos.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license by CJ Kucera |
||
| 1 | >>>>> "CJ" == CJ Kucera <pez@××××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | CJ> Yes, somebody could use an XFree 4.4 ebuild, link |
| 4 | CJ> some other programs against it, and then be violating the GPL, |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No, they would not be violating the GPL unless they then |
| 7 | *distributed the combined result*. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The GPL does not regulate use, only distribution. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -JimC |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: No XFree86 w/ new license | CJ Kucera <pez@××××××××××××.com> |