Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: splitting virtual/ | ||
| Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:07:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110817190151.09976514@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: splitting virtual/ by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:58:32 -0700 |
| 2 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > You can insist on this SRC_URI + DEFINED_PHASES approach, but I doubt |
| 4 | > that package manager developers will want to rely on these kinds of |
| 5 | > fragile assumptions. You thought that relying on the "virtual" |
| 6 | > category name was ridiculous, but this SRC_URI + DEFINED_PHASES |
| 7 | > approach seems must less practical to me. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The difference is, SRC_URI + DEFINED_PHASES is guaranteed to work. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: splitting virtual/ | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |