Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's problems
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:26:21
Message-Id: 20070316112302.54153c0a@snowdrop
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's problems by Steve Long
1 On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:44:02 +0000 Steve Long
2 <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 > > There's a difference between UI improvements like FEATURES=candy
4 > > and UI improvements like ability to do dependency-based uninstalls
5 > > (merely one example). UI improvements that improve user experience
6 > > substantially are fine. Minor UI improvements are good too, but not
7 > > when they're being touted as significant achievements.
8 > >
9 > Oh ffs, why don't you stop all this negativity, and post some
10 > algorithms for once?
11
12 http://paludis.pioto.org/
13
14 Look, a completely reimplemented alternative to Portage complete with
15 huge numbers of substantial improvements!
16
17 --
18 Ciaran McCreesh
19 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
20 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
21 Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature