Archives
Archives
| From: | Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's problems | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:48:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | etdld4$emc$2@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Gentoo's problems by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | > There's a difference between UI improvements like FEATURES=candy and UI |
| 2 | > improvements like ability to do dependency-based uninstalls (merely one |
| 3 | > example). UI improvements that improve user experience substantially |
| 4 | > are fine. Minor UI improvements are good too, but not when they're |
| 5 | > being touted as significant achievements. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | Oh ffs, why don't you stop all this negativity, and post some algorithms for |
| 8 | once? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Gentoo's problems | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> |