| 1 |
2009/5/15 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) <hkBst@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Thilo Bangert wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Fedora is a much more current distribution than Gentoo - and has been for |
| 6 |
>> a couple of years... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Please elaborate what exactly you think Fedora does better than we do. I have no |
| 9 |
> first-hand experience with Fedora, but from what I read I had the impression |
| 10 |
> that sometimes they go with new stuff before it is ready, like KDE4 and pulseaudio. |
| 11 |
> I like about the current situation that we also have all those things available |
| 12 |
> AFAICS, but have very broad choices in how much we want to bleed. |
| 13 |
> IMO this is a different issue than having supposedly popular ebuilds not in main |
| 14 |
> tree. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
AFAIK Fedora (formerly Red Hat Linux) is the playground for Red Hat |
| 18 |
Enterprise Linux like Opensuse is for Suse Linux Enterprise. So it |
| 19 |
makes more sense to compare it with the Gentoo unstable tree instead |
| 20 |
of the stable one. Assuming this there is probably not a big |
| 21 |
difference in the up-to-dateness. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Daniel Pielmeier |
Archives