Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:24:50
Message-Id: pan.2009.05.15.12.24.22@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted by Daniel Pielmeier
1 Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@××××××××××.com> posted
2 6142e6140905150344y4a8007b5wd352ffe891e49230@××××××××××.com, excerpted
3 below, on Fri, 15 May 2009 12:44:47 +0200:
4
5 > 2009/5/15 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) <hkBst@g.o>:
6 >>
7 >> Thilo Bangert wrote:
8 >>>
9 >>> Fedora is a much more current distribution than Gentoo - and has been
10 >>> for a couple of years...
11 >>
12 >> Please elaborate what exactly you think Fedora does better than we do.
13 >> I have no first-hand experience with Fedora, but from what I read I had
14 >> the impression that sometimes they go with new stuff before it is
15 >> ready, like KDE4 and pulseaudio. I like about the current situation
16 >> that we also have all those things available AFAICS, but have very
17 >> broad choices in how much we want to bleed. IMO this is a different
18 >> issue than having supposedly popular ebuilds not in main tree.
19 >>
20 > AFAIK Fedora is [Red Hat's unstable.] So it makes more sense to
21 > compare it with the Gentoo unstable tree instead of the stable
22 > one. Assuming this there is probably not a big difference in the
23 > up-to-dateness.
24
25 Well, yes and no. As the GP said, they sometimes go with new stuff
26 before it's ready -- before Gentoo even has it in-tree hard-masked let
27 alone ~arch, while it's still in the various project overlays. I know
28 they've had some serious issues with xorg on Intel GPUs at least, due to
29 running versions that aren't in our tree yet, only in the X overlay,
30 because Fedora is running clearly not even ~arch-ready packages,
31 sometimes even xorg prereleases.
32
33 Years ago we'd have put these in-tree but hard-masked for those who
34 wanted to try them. Now, depending on the package and Gentoo but more
35 likely as the complexity rises to meta-package levels, those who want to
36 try them must load an overlay. As someone who selectively unmasks and
37 tries these, having them in-tree but hard-masked is convenient, but I
38 understand why projects may prefer overlays in many cases.
39
40 However, none of this directly applies to the subject at hand, because
41 while we're talking new versions of packages already in-tree here, the
42 subject at hand is packages that aren't in-tree in any form yet.
43
44 --
45 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
46 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
47 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>