Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: modifications to GLEP42
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 22:14:32
Message-Id: 20070505230855.418f2380@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: modifications to GLEP42 by expose@luftgetrock.net
1 On Sun, 6 May 2007 00:00:11 +0200
2 expose@×××××××××××.net wrote:
3 > Paludis will still work, after the upgrade, but it will produce
4 > warnings. So there are no problems at all, it still works just fine.
5
6 Paludis producing a warning (as opposed to a lower level notice --
7 Paludis has different levels for log notices, of which 'warning' is
8 the highest) is something that is considered critical enough that the
9 user should fix it before continuing. Were it not critical, a different
10 log level would be used.
11
12 This thread is not, however, about Paludis. Please keep future moaning
13 about Paludis in the appropriate thread.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: modifications to GLEP42 expose@×××××××××××.net