| 1 |
On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your userland |
| 5 |
> > > is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild |
| 6 |
> > > writers. you want a deficient runtime environment, more power to you, but |
| 7 |
> > > forcing that environment onto ebuild developers is not acceptable. off the |
| 8 |
> > > top of my head, i'd like to see GNU find/xargs added to the ebuild |
| 9 |
> > > environment. |
| 10 |
> > > -mike |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Mike, exactly as I said. That's option #2, and I think it could be a |
| 13 |
> > great solution. As for deficient, well, that's in the eye of the |
| 14 |
> > beholder. ;) |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > -Joe |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Question, if you go for #2. Does that mean you will need all the |
| 19 |
> required GNU userland to do binary only installs? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> It would be highly desireable to be able to do binary installs (write |
| 22 |
> your own binary only package manager) without depending on all the GNU |
| 23 |
> stuff needed to compile the packages. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Your own binary only package manager would still need to provide |
| 26 |
Option #2; ie you need to have GNU tools installed to process the |
| 27 |
binary packages. pkg_* functions could still have GNU stuff in them |
| 28 |
and those still get run during a binary package install. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-Alec |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives