Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:48:55
Message-Id: 1122907586.16102.3.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles by Benedikt Boehm
1 On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
2 > On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
3 > > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid
4 > > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone
5 > > stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or
6 > > not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux,
7 > > as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles
8 > > are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles
9 > > are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd.
10 > >
11 >
12 > vserver/*
13
14 Not true.
15
16 vserver itself is not a valid profile. This is exactly why I am asking
17 for this information. From what I can tell, only vserver/x86 is valid.
18
19 --
20 Chris Gianelloni
21 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
22 Games - Developer
23 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Valid Profiles Benedikt Boehm <hollow@g.o>