| 1 |
On Monday 01 August 2005 16:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 20:21 +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 31 July 2005 16:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > ka0ttic reminded me about the idea of adding all of the valid |
| 5 |
> > > profiles to profiles.desc now that portage 2.0.51.22 has gone |
| 6 |
> > > stable. Well, I need you guys to give me a list of what is valid or |
| 7 |
> > > not. I have a pretty good idea of what is valid under default-linux, |
| 8 |
> > > as far as the default profiles go, but need to know which profiles |
| 9 |
> > > are development profiles. I especially need to know which profiles |
| 10 |
> > > are valid for projects like embedded, hardened, and *bsd. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > vserver/* |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Not true. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> vserver itself is not a valid profile. This is exactly why I am asking |
| 17 |
> for this information. From what I can tell, only vserver/x86 is valid. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
well, you're right... just thought it's enough to state that everything in |
| 20 |
vserver/ is valid ;) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
He who asks a question is a fool for a minute, |
| 24 |
He who doesn't ask is a fool for a lifetime. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives