Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:10:50
Message-Id: 42F0C27B.2060001@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mike Frysinger schrieb:
5 | On Wednesday 03 August 2005 07:16 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
6 |
7 |>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
8 |>
9 |>>On Monday 01 August 2005 10:43 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
10 |>Last time I checked, only --without-pic or --disable-static disable
11 |>compiling twice.
12 |
13 |
14 | my tests show that with libtool 1.5.18 --without-pic doesnt change
15 | anything ... obviously --disable-static changes things same as
16 | --disable-shared would :P
17 |
18 | maybe i just did it wrong ... i used imlib2-1.2.0 as a reference
19 | -mike
20 According to libtool's source, it only compiles things twice if it shall
21 build 'old-libs' ($build_old_libs=yes) _and_ shared libraries. If it
22 builds 'libtool-libs' ($build_libtool_libs=yes) it uses the same object
23 files for both the static and the shared library.
24
25 But I might be comletely wrong... libtool's internals are sometimes so
26 confusing :-/
27
28 Danny
29 - --
30 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
31 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
34
35 iD8DBQFC8MJ7aVNL8NrtU6IRAh5OAKCLThNfuQH+vq8hCKZUxZZhz/8zuwCcD61l
36 rBB/S+0uH0MiRt5lNZj3eMo=
37 =gBww
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>