Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:52:52
Message-Id: 200508030850.37262.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass by Martin Schlemmer
1 On Wednesday 03 August 2005 07:16 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > On Monday 01 August 2005 10:43 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
4 > > > Mike Frysinger schrieb:
5 > > > |>your USE=pic example is wrong, it does not change CFLAGS (and if your
6 > > > |>package does, it is broken)
7 > > >
8 > > > chillispot at least is not wrong. If USE="pic" is set, it compiles
9 > > > _only with_ -fPIC, ommiting to compile files twice and effectivly
10 > > > telling libtool not to produce a normal static library.
11 > >
12 > > just to review ... `use_with pic` should never be used because if you
13 > > dont have 'pic' in your USE flags, the ebuild will run `./configure
14 > > --without-pic` ... that means libtool will try to produce shared and
15 > > static libraries with object files which were built without PIC ... on
16 > > many arches (like amd64), the linker will abort
17 > >
18 > > btw, where do you get this information ? my tests show that libtool
19 > > still compiles all files twice even though --with-pic was used ...
20 >
21 > Last time I checked, only --without-pic or --disable-static disable
22 > compiling twice.
23
24 my tests show that with libtool 1.5.18 --without-pic doesnt change
25 anything ... obviously --disable-static changes things same as
26 --disable-shared would :P
27
28 maybe i just did it wrong ... i used imlib2-1.2.0 as a reference
29 -mike
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] The dreaded debug use flag/eclass Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>