1 |
W dniu nie, 08.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶02 +0200, użytkownik Kristian |
2 |
Fiskerstrand napisał: |
3 |
> On 07/08/2018 08:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > Is safe git syncing implemented already? If not, maybe finish it first and cover both with a single news item. Git is going to be more efficient here, so people may want to learn they have an alternative. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Why complicate things, and increase wait for something that benefits |
7 |
> most users, just to give alternatives to a few using non-default sync |
8 |
> mechanism. Securing git distribution is a whole different ballpark. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
Let me rephrase. Let's say I'm using rsync. This new feature is |
12 |
something positive but it breaks my use case (for one of the listed |
13 |
reasons -- overlayfs, inode use, small fs cache). After reading this |
14 |
news item, I learn that my only option is to disable the new feature. |
15 |
|
16 |
Now, I would appreciate being told that there's an alternate sync method |
17 |
that handles secure updates without having all those drawbacks. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Michał Górny |