| 1 |
Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 01:53 -0400 schrieb Andrew D Kirch: |
| 2 |
> Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 3 |
> > All, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for |
| 6 |
> > weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the |
| 7 |
> > senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54, |
| 8 |
> > GLEP55, and EAPI-3 without any real progress or sense coming of them. |
| 9 |
> > It's taken me a little bit to step up and put a stop to it but I fully |
| 10 |
> > intend on putting a stop to it. The point of the council meetings is |
| 11 |
> > to bring up a topic and decide on its merits whether it should be |
| 12 |
> > brought into the Gentoo Project or not. I quote from the first line of |
| 13 |
> > the Gentoo Council website: |
| 14 |
> I would strongly advice that EAPI-3 and GLEP's 54/55 be dropped at least |
| 15 |
> for the time being (at a minimum 90 days). The argument has left any |
| 16 |
> trappings of merit or rational behind, and has replaced them with |
| 17 |
> religion. As this is now a dogmatic issue a resolution cannot be |
| 18 |
> reached at this time. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > We have all collectively failed the Gentoo Project since we have not |
| 21 |
> > been doing this for the past several weeks. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Vigorous debate fails no one. Religious zealotry however fails us all. |
| 24 |
> In recognizing that this is what's happening iwth EAPI-3, and GLEP's |
| 25 |
> 54/55 is the first step towards moving on to a new and fair debate on |
| 26 |
> these issues down the road. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Why are you mentioning EAPI-3 here? That topic got closed two meetings |
| 29 |
ago. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Tiziano Müller |
| 33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member |
| 34 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 35 |
Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor |
| 36 |
E-Mail : dev-zero@g.o |
| 37 |
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 |
Archives