1 |
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> I think the plan to split mailing lists serves as a way to insulate |
5 |
>> developers from the effects of their decisions. Anyone with an |
6 |
>> incongenial tone will have their voice bit revoked and their mail will |
7 |
>> be dropped or rejected. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> And what would you do when somebody repeatedly sexually harasses other |
10 |
> members of the community in private after being told to stop, and then |
11 |
> acts as if they're the victim on the public mailing lists? |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
If you are going to allege misconduct you need to be prepared to prove it. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Pretty much every organization I've ever been in would quietly show |
17 |
> such a person the door unless the victim went public with the |
18 |
> allegations. Most normal people wouldn't want to be a part of an |
19 |
> organization that didn't do such a thing. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Apparently though in Gentoo some prefer that the victims of harassment |
22 |
> have no recourse if the harassment doesn't happen on the gentoo-dev |
23 |
> mailing list in public. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> If you think some cabal is running the show just run for Council. If |
26 |
> you win then you get the lucky job of trying to explain all this |
27 |
> without disclosing the horrible things that some people do in private. |
28 |
> Of course, lots of people won't believe you, since they profess to be |
29 |
> innocent and the evidence can't be disclosed without bringing harm to |
30 |
> a victim or creating the possibility of a defamation lawsuit. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Like in the thread about potential piracy issues with ebuilds, people |
34 |
are being too cautious. For a defamation suit it would be necessary to |
35 |
prove malicious intent, and then, only in the first circuit. |
36 |
|
37 |
I'm still waiting for the notice that I can't use Gentoo to |
38 |
manufacture weapons of mass destruction. |
39 |
|
40 |
Respectfully, |
41 |
R0b0t1 |