| 1 |
Dnia 2013-10-14, o godz. 09:26:43 |
| 2 |
Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Oct 14, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> I don't see a compelling case being made for why we should make this |
| 8 |
> >> change apart from "all the other distros are doing it", and quite a |
| 9 |
> >> few reasons why we shouldn't. I'm open to being convinced, so please |
| 10 |
> >> tell me why this is good for Gentoo users. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > So far I've seen a reference to a bug associated with a bunch of |
| 13 |
> > systemd issues when it isn't mounted, and the point that many things |
| 14 |
> > break in namespaces without the symlink, since /etc/mtab does not |
| 15 |
> > reflect the state of the namespace. The latter in particular seems |
| 16 |
> > like a pretty fundamental limitation - the very concept of /etc/mtab |
| 17 |
> > is that mounts are global, and the design of linux is that mounts are |
| 18 |
> > NOT global. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Why should this not be treated as a systemd bug? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Is it a Linux kernel bug that it supports mount namespaces? Since |
| 23 |
userspace clearly wasn't designed for that 20 years ago, so Linux |
| 24 |
clearly has a bug supporting that! |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Michał Górny |
Archives