Archives
Archives
| From: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies | ||
| Date: | Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:59:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200901041658.56725.levertond@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies by Nirbheek Chauhan |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 04 January 2009 16:48:38 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 2 | > On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of |
| 3 | > the tree showed that: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | In how many of those ebuilds would the long form be |
| 6 | use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) |
| 7 | rather than |
| 8 | use1? ( cat/pkg[use2] ) !use1? ( cat/pkg ) |
| 9 | ? Obviously I didn't look through all the hits, but the former seems quite |
| 10 | common, and any possible shortcut would only save a few characters. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> |