Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:48:41
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad0901040848m3f3a701fs63f6e1386911dd1b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
2 <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:34:18 +0530
4 > "Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >> How about this:
6 >
7 > It's utterly useless. Unlike the existing shortcut forms, what you're
8 > after isn't widely enough used to warrant its own shortcut. Use the
9 > expanded form and have done with it.
10
11 On the contrary, the reverse of what you say is true. A simple grep of
12 the tree showed that:
13
14 95 ebuilds do "use\ \([a-zA-Z0-9]\+\).*\&\&.*built_with_use.*\ \1\ "
15 and 937 do "use.*\&\&.*built_with_use"
16
17 So, one would assume that ~842 ebuilds could make use of the
18 pkg[foo?bar] syntax.
19
20 Of course, this missed the ebuilds which do
21
22 if use blah; then
23 built_with_use ...
24 ...
25 fi
26
27 But statistically, these numbers should be accurate.
28
29 --
30 ~Nirbheek Chauhan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] USE dependencies Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>